Film as an anthropologic and ethical experience
Keywords:
Film, experience, anthropology, ethics, creativityAbstract
Films have broadened reality or, at least, our image of reality, and has broadened as well our virtual experience of life. Due to this factor it may be considered the main anthropologist of our times. The seventh art, following the ancient human tradition of storytelling, also manifests the narrative character of the human being. The human animal is also a relational being as well as dialogical, that is, it is only constitutes in relation to others: there is no I without a you. This reason explains that the whole life has an argument in which others are necessarily acting characters. Film arguments show us that human life is a relation, links of several narrative forms. This is obtained by showing man’s true reality of man, without hiding its mystery, showing him in his daily basis, pressing him to see, imagine and do projects. This is the very educational and ethical function of the seventh art. It is also possible affirm that ethics is an experience and an art in the sense that a persons ethical ideas depend, mostly, on his vital experiences. Personalist philosophers mention three kinds of experiences: encounter, dominion and fusion. Of those three, encounter is the most creative one. Persons do encounter themselves, but things dominate and fusion. Ethics, as well, is an art because each individual must create the most valuable answers for each situation. But there are conducts that, instead of being creative, are destructive of the person’s dignity. Taking reference these three kinds of experiences it is possible to value a film’s ethical strength.
Metrics
References
BALLÓ, J. y PÉREZ, X. (1997). La semilla inmortal. Los argumentos universales en el cine.
Barcelona: Anagrama.
BOCHENSKY, I.M. (1979). Qué es la autoridad. Barcelona: Herder.
BUBER, M. (1964). ¿Qué es el hombre? México: F.C.E.
CAPARRÓS, J.M. (1999). El cine de nuestros días (1994-1998). Madrid: Rialp.
DE MILLE, C.B. (1959). Autobiography. Publisher Information: Prentice Hall.
DÍAZ NOSTY, B. (2001). Informe Anual de la Comunicación 2000-2001. Madrid:
Grupo Z.
DÍAZ, L. (1999). Informe sobre la televisión en España (1989-1998) Barcelona:
Ediciones B.
LÓPEZ QUINTÁS, A. (1977). Estética de la creatividad. Juego. Arte. Literatura. Madrid:
Cátedra.
——— (1991). Para comprender la experiencia estética y su poder formativo. Pamplona: Ed.
Verbo Divino.
——— (1994). Cómo formarse en ética a través de la literatura. Madrid: Rialp.
MACINTYRE, A. (1987). Tras la virtud. Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.
MARÍAS, J. (1992). La educación sentimental. Madrid: Alianza.
MONTALT, S. (2003). Tres colores: Rojo. Estudio crítico. Barcelona: Paidós
MUÑOZ, J.J. (2003). Cine y misterio humano. Madrid: Rialp.
——— (2005). De Casablanca a Solas. La creatividad ética en cine y televisión. Madrid:
Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias.
PARDO, A. (2001). “El cine como medio de comunicación y la responsabilidad
social del cineasta”, en CODINA, M. (ed.). De la ética desprotegida. Pamplona:
EUNSA, pp. 119-125.
PUTTNAM, D., “Filmmakers are missing their social purpose”, en Los Ángeles Times, May 2,
, 7, cit. por PARDO, A. (2001). “El cine como medio de comunicación y la
responsabilidad social del cineasta”, en CODINA, M. (ed.). De la ética desprotegida.
Pamplona: EUNSA, pp. 119-125.
ROHMER, E. (2000). El gusto por la belleza. Barcelona: Paidós.
SÁNCHEZ-ESCALONILLA, A. (2002). Guión de aventura y forja del héroe. Barcelona:
Ariel.
TUDOR, A. (1975). Cine y comunicación social. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
ZUBIRI, X. (1983). Inteligencia y razón. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
——— (1986). Sobre el hombre. Madrid: Alianza editorial.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Comunicación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.