Political and institutional communication and the media in times of pandemic. Analysis of the dialogue on vaccines in five Ibero-American countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26441/RC21.1-2022-A16Keywords:
political communication, mass media, Vaccination, social media, political institution, Covid-1Abstract
The current media context is characterized as a hybrid system in which old and new actors coexist and, at the same time, compete for their hegemony in the media sphere. In this context, Covid-19 has generated an “infodemic” or information overexposure that has made it difficult for citizens to access reliable sources and guidance. Therefore, the main objective of this article is to characterize the political, institutional and media actors who have reported on Twitter about vaccines and immunization processes during the Covid-19 pandemic in five Ibero-American countries: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Spain and Mexico. To this end, a total of 68,822 tweets from 84 accounts belonging to the country's presidents, the official accounts of governments, health authorities and their spokespersons, and the main media have been analyzed. The results indicate that the most intense activity and the informative weight have been carried by the health authorities and the media, although the personal accounts of the spokespersons and political representatives have achieved a much greater engagement. The interaction of the audiences has been mostly positive, although the most active users and with the highest level of participation have made comments for the most part negative. These results allow us to conclude that in the hybrid system, the media and institutional communication cabinets show a similar capacity to disseminate messages through social networks that generate a favorable reception, although in the case of public representatives, engagement, and also the polarization, they are much greater.
Metrics
References
Aalberg, T., Blekesaune, A., & Elvestad, E. (2013). Media Choice and Informed Democracy: Toward Increasing News Consumption Gaps in Europe? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213485990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213485990
Almgren, S. M., & Olsson, T. (2016). Commenting, sharing and tweeting news: Measuring online news participation. Nordicom Review, 37(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2016-0018
Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Hooker, C. M., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2018). Online news creation, trust in the media, and political participation: Direct and moderating effects over time. Journalism, 19(5), 611–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917700447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917700447
Barandiaran-Irastorza, X., Unceta-Satrústegui, A., & Peña-Fernández, Simón (2020). Comunicación Política en tiempos de Nueva Cultura Política. Icono14, 18(1), 256-282. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v18i1.1382
Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
Bentele, G., & Nothhaft, H. (2011). Trust and Credibility as the Basis of Corporate Social Responsibility. In Ø. Ihlen, J. L. Bartlett, & S. May (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication and Corporate Social Responsibility (pp. 1-22). Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118083246.ch1
Brunner, B. (2017). Community, Engagement, and Democracy: Re-envisioning Public Relations and Public Interest Communications through Civic Professionalism. Journal of Public Interest Communications, 1(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v1.i1.p45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/jpic.v1.i1.p45
Calderón, César (2011). ¿Qué es el gobierno abierto? Cuadernos de comunicación Evoca, 4, 5-9.
Carlson, M. (2017). Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/carl17444
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on the media system. Communicative and democratic consequences of news consumption during the outbreak. Profesional de la información, 29(2), e290223. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.mar.23
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS) (2021). Barómetro de febrero de 2021. Estudio nº 3309. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3309marMT_A.pdf
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
Chen, Y., & Skiena, S. (2014). Constructing Sentiment Lexicons for All Major Languages. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 383–389). Association for Computational Linguistic. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-2063
Dahl, R. A. (2006). On political equality. Yale University Press.
Demšar, J., Curk, T., Erjavec, A., Gorup, Č., Hočevar, T., Milutinovič, M., Možina, M., Polajnar, M., Toplak, M., Starič, A., Štajdohar, M., Umek, L., Žagar, L., Žbontar, J., Žitnik, M., & Zupan, B. (2013). Orange: Data Mining Toolbox in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 2349−2353.
Dredze, M., Broniatowski, D. A., Smith, M. C., & Hilyard, K. M. (2016). Understanding Vaccine Refusal: Why We Need Social Media Now. American journal of preventive medicine, 50(4), 550–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.002
Edelman (2021). Trust Barometer 2021. https://www.edelman.com.es/trust-barometer-spain-2021
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
Jenkins, H., Ford, S. & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. NYU Press.
Kampen, J. K., & Snijkers, K. (2003). E-Democracy: A Critical Evaluation of the Ultimate E-Dream. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 491–496, http://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303256095
Kang, G. J., Ewing-Nelson, S. R., Mackey, L., Schlitt, J. T., Marathe, A., Abbas, K. M. & Swarup, S. (2017). Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine, 35(29), 3621-3638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052
Larrondo-Ureta, A., Peña-Fernández, S., & Morales-i-Gras, J. (2021). Desinformación, vacunas y Covid-19. Análisis de la infodemia y la conversación digital en Twitter. Revista Latina De Comunicación Social, 79, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1504
López-Rico, C. M., González-Esteban, J. L., & Hernández-Martínez, A. (2020). Polarización y confianza en los medios españoles durante el Covid-19. Identificación de perfiles de audiencia. Revista Española de comunicación en salud, 77-89. https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5439
Macnamara, J. (2018). Public Relations and Post-Communication. Addressing a paradox in public communication. Public Relations Journal, 11(3), 1-20.
Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L., Amado-Suárez, A. & Waisbord, S. (2021). Twitter presidencial ante la COVID-19: Entre el populismo y la política pop. Comunicar, 66, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3916/C66-2021-07
Masip, P., Ruiz-Caballero, C., & Suau, J. (2019). Active audiences and social discussion on the digital public sphere. Review article. El profesional de la información, 28(2), e280204. https://doi.org//10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.04
Morales-i-Gras, J. (2020). Minería de datos de los medios sociales, técnicas para el análisis de datos masivos. Fundació Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (FUOC).
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. University of Oxford.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) (2020, 23 de septiembre). Gestión de la infodemia sobre la COVID-19: Promover comportamientos saludables y mitigar los daños derivados de la información incorrecta y falsa. https://www.who.int/es/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation
Palau, D., & Gómez-Mompart, J. L. (2015). Calidad y credibilidad, un binomio inexorable para el futuro de los medios. Periodística, 16, 11-28. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.3008.02.35
Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A Prívate Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Polity.
Pérez-Dasilva, J. A., Meso-Ayerdi, K., & Mendiguren-Galdospin, T. (2020). Fake news y coronavirus: detección de los principales actores y tendencias a través del análisis de las conversaciones en Twitter. Profesional de la Información, 29(3), e290308. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.08
Quandt, T. (2018). Dark Participation. Media and Communication, 6(4), pp. 36-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v6i4.1519
Roses, S., & Gómez-Calderón, B. (2015). Credibilidad de los medios en España: divergencias de percepción y caracterización de los escépticos. Profesional de la Información, 24(4), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.10
Sierra-Rodríguez, J. (2020). Periodismo, comunicación institucional y transparencia: aprendizajes de la crisis sanitaria del COVID-19. Revista de Comunicación y Salud: RCyS, 10(2), 569-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2020.10(2).569-591
Sunstein, C. (2017). #Republic. Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884711
Tewksbury, D., & Rittenberg, Jason (2012). News on the Internet: Information and Citizenship in the 21st Century. Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391961.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195391961.001.0001
Tucker, J.A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
Vállez, M., & Pérez-Montoro, M. (2020). La comunicación periodística en tiempos de pandemia: análisis del tratamiento de la COVID-19 en la prensa europea. Hipertext.net, 21(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2020.i21.01
Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866-1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881
Wilson, K., & Keelan, J. (2013). Social media and the empowering of opponents of medical technologies: the case of anti-vaccinationism. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e103. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2409
Witteman, H. O., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2012). The defining characteristics of Web 2.0 and their potential influence in the online vaccination debate. Vaccine, 30(25), 3734-3740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.039
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista de Comunicación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Portal de Revistas de la Universidad de Piura.