Gendered dynamics of Twitter engagement: An analysis of Colombian parliamentarians during electoral and non-electoral periods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26441/RC24.1-2025-3691Keywords:
Women politicians, Gender political equality, Political communication, Elections, Twitter, ColombiaAbstract
This study investigates the gender dynamics in how Colombian members of Congress use Twitter during electoral and non-electoral periods. Using a quantitative analysis of 689,576 tweets collected in 2020 and 2022, the findings reveal nuanced differences in social media behaviour between male and female politicians. While male politicians generally have a larger follower base and higher retweet rates during non-electoral periods, these advantages diminish or even reverse during elections. Female politicians show relative gains in retweets and follower acquisition during electoral periods, suggesting that heightened competition and visibility create a more level playing field for engagement.
Contrary to expectations, male politicians tweet more frequently overall, but female politicians increase their activity significantly during elections. These findings suggest that gender disparities in political communication on Twitter are not static but context-dependent, with electoral periods offering unique opportunities for female politicians to amplify their messages. While further research is needed to explore the role of content and audience behaviour, this study highlights the complex interplay of gender, visibility, and engagement in online political communication.
Metrics
References
Aaldering, L., & Van Der Pas, D. (2020). Political leadership in the media: gender bias in leader stereotypes during campaign and routine times. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000795
Anderson, K.V. (2017). Every woman is the wrong woman: the female presidentiality paradox. Women’s Studies in Communication, 40(2), 132–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2017.1302257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2017.1302257
Aruguete, N., & Calvo, E. (2018). Time to #Protest: selective exposure, cascading activation, and framing in social media. Journal of Communication, 68(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy007
Banwart, M. C. (2010). Gender and candidate communication: effects of stereotypes in the 2008 Election. American Behavioral Scientist, 54(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210381702 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210381702
Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis, 23(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu011
Bartolomé Peral, E., Silvestre, M., Kamatayeva, A., & Voicu, B. (2024). Value Change Regarding Gender Roles and Backlash in Europe: Is Gender a New Polarization Element? International Journal of Communication, 18, 3347–3367. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21959/4690
Bauer, N. M., & Santia, M. (2021). Going feminine: identifying how and when female candidates emphasize feminine and masculine traits on the campaign trail. Political Research Quarterly, 75(3), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211020257 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211020257
Beaulieu, E., & Hyde, S. (2009). In the shadow of democracy promotion: strategic manipulation, international observers, and election boycotts. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414008325571
Beltran, J., Gallego, A., Huidobro, A., Romero, E., & Padró, L. (2021). Male and female politicians on Twitter: A machine learning approach. European Journal of Political Research, 60(1), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12392
Berasategi Zeberio, M., Pando-Canteli, M. J., & Rodríguez, M. P. (2024). Gender and Far-Right Women Political Representatives: A Twitter Discourse Network Analysis. International Journal of Communication, 18, 3425-3446. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21965/4689
Bernal-Olarte, A. (2011). Elecciones parlamentarias de 2010: análisis de la inclusión de mujeres. Colombia Internacional, 74. http://journals.openedition.org/colombiaint/15840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint74.2011.05
Bustelo, M., & Mazur, A. G. (2023). The practice of ideas in gender equality policy: comparative lessons from the field. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 6(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16696345290590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16696345290590
Carpinella, C., & Bauer, N. M. (2021). A visual analysis of gender stereotypes in campaign advertising. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 9, 369–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1637353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1637353
Coates Nee, R., & De Maio, M. (2019). A ‘presidential look’? An analysis of gender framing in 2016 persuasive memes of Hillary Clinton. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(2), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1620561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1620561
Coffé, H., Helimäki, T., & Von Schoultz, Å. (2023). How gender affects negative and positive campaigning. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 44(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2023.2180610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2023.2180610
Denemark, D., Ward, I., & Bean, C. (2012). Gender and leader effects in the 2010 Australian election. Australian Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 563–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.731485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2012.731485
Dittmar, K. (2015). Navigating gendered terrain: stereotypes and strategy in political campaigns. Temple University Press.
Duque Daza, J. (2022). Elecciones de Congreso en Colombia en 2022. ¿Pluralismo, cambio y renovación? Reflexión Política, 24(50), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29375/01240781.4543
Duval, D., & Bouchard, J. (2021). Gender, the media and parity: the case of the 2018 Québec election. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 54, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842392100038X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842392100038X
Eagly, A. H. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: does gender matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007
Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: a cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. Public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494
Esposito, E., & Breeze, R. (2022). Gender and politics in a digitalized world: investigating online hostility against UK female MPs. Discourse & Society, 33(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221076608
Erickson, J., Yan, B., & Huang, J. (2023). Bridging echo chambers? Understanding political partisanship through Semantic Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231186368
Evans, H. K., & Clark, J. H. (2016). “You tweet like a girl!”: how female candidates campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research, 44(2), 326–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597747
Evans, H., Cordova, V., & Sipole, S. (2014). Twitter style: an analysis of how house candidates used Twitter in their 2012 campaigns. Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096514000389
Ferré-Pavia, C., Gayà Morlà, C., & Abrego, K. (2024). Female politicians and communicative empowerment: moving towards a safe space that make them visible in social media (under revision).
Freidenberg, F. (2020). Electoral reform and women political representation in Latin America. The Encyclopaedia of Latin American Politics. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780190933609.001.0001/acref-9780190933609;jsessionid=A8A31C2718DCAD036431AF8A556776D1
Fridkin, K., & Kenney, P. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in U.S. Senate campaigns. Politics & Gender, 5(3), 301–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990158
Fulton, S. A., Maestas, C. D., Maisel, L. S., & Stone, W. J. (2006). The sense of a woman: gender, ambition, and the decision to run for congress. Political Research Quarterly, 59(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900206
González, A. K., & Ferré-Pavia, C. (2024). Estrategias de comunicación en la era digital: análisis del uso de “X” por parte de las congresistas colombianas. Análisis Político, 37(108), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v37n108.116974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v37n108.116974
González, A. K., & Ferré-Pavia, C. (2023). Colombian politicians and Twitter usage: on the path to gender parity. Political Research Exchange, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2023.2218909 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2474736X.2023.2218909
Graham, T., & Schwanholz, J. (2020). Politicians and political parties use of social media in-between elections. Journal of Applied Journalism and Media Studies, 9(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00017_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00017_1
Guerrero-Solé, F., & Perales-García, C. (2021). Bridging the gap: how gender influences Spanish politicians’ activity on Twitter. Journalism and Media, 2(28), 469–483. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2030028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia2030028
Haman, M. (2023). Political communication on social media in Latin America: unequal use of Twitter by members of parliament. Profesional de la información, 32(3), e320316. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.16
Haraldsson, A., & Wängnerud, L. (2019). The effect of media sexism on women’s political ambition: evidence from a worldwide study. Feminist Media Studies, 19(4), 525–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1468797 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1468797
Harp, D., Loke, J., & Bachmann, I. (2016). Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi hearing coverage: Political Competence, Authenticity, and the Persistence of the Double Bind. Women’s Studies in Communication, 39(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2016.1171267
Himelboim, I., Smith, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2013). Tweeting apart: applying network analysis to detect selective exposure clusters in Twitter. Communication methods and measures, 7(3-4),195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2013.813922
Hosseini, B. (2019). Women’s survival through social media: A narrative analysis. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 180–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2019.1610612 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2019.1610612
Hrbková, L., & Macková, A. (2021). Campaign like a girl? Gender and communication on social networking sites in the Czech Parliamentary election. Information, Communication & Society, 24(11), 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1716040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1716040
León Patiño, X. (2022). Colombia, régimen electoral de género débil, resistencias partidistas y baja representación descriptiva de las mujeres. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México e Instituto Nacional Electoral, 369–390. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/15/7158/17.pdf
Long, M., Dawe, R., & Suhay, E. (2021). Gender attitudes and candidate preferences in the 2016 U.S. Presidential primary and general elections. Politics & Gender, 18(3), 830–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000155 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000155
López, J., Cuellar, D., Alvarado, S., Rincón, M. A., Velandia, M. P., & Cantor, M. A. (2021). Campaña por la Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá (2019): Agenda, argumentos y tonos del debate en Twitter. Opinião Pública, 27(3), 558–584. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-019120212731058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-019120212731058
Lowndes, V. (2020). How are political institutions gendered? Political Studies, 68(3): 543–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719867667
Meneguelli, G. & Ferré-Pavia, C. (2016). Apology of polemics as an argumentative modality: public conflict in 2015 Brazil demonstrations. Culture, Language and Representation, 16, 57–84. https://www.e-revistes.uji.es/index.php/clr/article/view/2285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/CLR.2016.16.4
Meeks, L. (2016). Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268
Paatelainen, L., Kannasto, E., & Isotalus, P. (2022). Functions of hybrid media: how parties and their leaders use traditional media in their social media campaign communication. Frontiers in Communication, 6, 817285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.817285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.817285
Panagopoulos, C. (2004). Boy talk/girl Talk. Women & Politics, 26(3), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1300/J014v26n03_06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2004.9971047
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3139/9783446431164
Piscopo, J. M., & Kenny, M. (2020). Rethinking the ambition gap: gender and candidate emergence in comparative perspective. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 3(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510819X15755447629661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/251510819X15755447629661
Rao, P., & Taboada, M. (2021). Gender Bias in the News: A scalable topic modelling and visualization framework. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.664737 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.664737
Rizkika, L. D., & Haryanto (2021). Women candidates and Islamic personalization in social media campaigns for local parliament elections in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 29(1), 72–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1878928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2021.1878928
Ross, K., Jansen, M., & Van de Wijngaert, L. (2019). Gender, politics and the tweeted campaign: tweeting about issues during the UK’s 2017 general election campaign. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510819X15662922007747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/251510819X15662922007747
Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: the role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.157
Russell, A., Macdonald, M., & Hua, W. (2023). Sit still, talk pretty: partisan differences among women candidates’ campaign appeals. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 44(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2023.2194232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2023.2194232
Saldaña, M., & Rosenberg, A. (2020). I Don’t Want You to Be My President! Incivility and Media Bias During the Presidential Election in Chile. Social Media + Society, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120969891
Sapiro, V., Cramer Walsh, K., Strach, P., & Hennings, V. (2011). Gender, context, and television advertising: A comprehensive analysis of 2000 and 2002 house races. Political Research Quarterly, 64(1), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909343583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909343583
Skogerbø, E., & Krumsvik, A.H. (2015). Newspapers, Facebook, and Twitter. Intermedial agenda setting in local election campaigns. Journalism Practice, 9(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.950471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.950471
Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., & Popa, S.A. (2020). The dynamics of political incivility on Twitter. SAGE Open, 10(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020919447
United Nations entity for gender equality and the empowerment of women & inter-parliamentary union (2021). Mujeres en la política. Digital library. https://www.unwomen.org/es/news/stories/2021/3/press-release-women-in-politics-new-data-shows-growth-but-also-setbacks
Wagner, A., Trimble, L., Curtin, J., Auer, M., & Woodman, V. (2022). Representations of political leadership qualities in news coverage of Australian and Canadian government Leaders. Politics & Gender, 18(3), 798–829. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X21000131
Wagner, K. M., Gainous, J., & Holman, M.R. (2017). I am woman, hear me tweet! Gender differences in Twitter use among congressional candidates. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(4), 430–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1554477X.2016.1268871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2016.1268871
Welp, Y., & Ruth, S. (2017). Presidentas twitteras: the social media use of Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and Dilma Rousseff. Women, Politics, and Democracy in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95009-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95009-6_8
Wills-Obregón, M. E. (2007). Inclusión sin representación. La irrupción política de las mujeres en Colombia, 1970-2000. Norma.
Windett, J. H. (2014). Gendered campaign strategies in U.S. Elections. American Politics Research, 42(4), 628–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X1350710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X13507101
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista de Comunicación

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.