Consumption of news and perception of fake news among Communication students from Brazil, Spain and Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26441/RC18.2-2019-A5Keywords:
fake news, journalism, university students, digital mediaAbstract
This article contributes to the debate on the current crisis of journalism, using the results of a research by questionnaire on the perception of fake news by students of Communication Studies in Brazil, Spain, and Portugal. Research involved 300 participants in universities in these countries. Results show more similarities than differences in their ability to detect fake news and to perceive its origin and where they circulate. Among the habits of consumption of news, it is detected the abandonment of conventional media in their home supports. However, is also observed a high use of digital versions of newspapers, radios and television stations and a special preference for news that arrives via social media. Students do not have habits of reading / listening / watching all the content of a news story and focus mostly on reading the headlines and leads.
Metrics
References
Bakir, V. & McStay, A. (2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions: Problems, causes, solutions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154-175.
Carlson, M. (2017). Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era. Columbia University Press.
Casero-Ripollés, A. (2012). Más allá de los diarios: el consumo de noticias de los jóvenes en la era digital/Beyond Newspapers: News Consumption among Young People in the Digital Era. Comunicar, 20(39), 151-158. Recuperado de https://www.revistacomunicar.com/indice/articulo.php?numero=39-2012-17
Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. DOI: 10.1177/1464884905056815.
Deuze, M. & Marjoribanks, T. (2009). Newswork. Journalism, 10(5), 555-561. DOI: 10.1177/1464884909106532.
Eason, D. L. (1986). On journalistic authority: the Janet Cooke scandal. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 3(4), 429-447. DOI: 10.1080/15295038609366674.
Egelhofer, J.L. & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782
Gans, H. J. (2004). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Northwestern University Press.
Guess, A., Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council, 9.
Harcup, T. & O'neill, D. (2001). What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism studies, 2(2), 261-280. DOI: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1150193.
Kunczik, M. (1997). Conceitos de Jornalismo: norte e sul-Manual de Comunicação. Edusp.
McGonagle, T. (2017). “Fake news” False fears or real concerns? Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 35(4), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051917738685
Mihailidis, P. & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media literacies in “post-fact” society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441-454.
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. & Nielsen, R.K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017 (June).
Norris, P. & Nai, A. (Eds.). (2017). Election watchdogs: transparency, accountability and integrity. Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (Ed.). (2009). Public Sentinel: News media and governance reform. The World Bank. Washington, EE.UU.
Ott, B. L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59-68.
Rapp, D. N. & Salovich, N. A. (2018). Can’t We Just Disregard Fake News? The Consequences of Exposure to Inaccurate Information. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5(2), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218785193
Roxo, M. A. & Melo, S. (2018). Hiperjornalismo: Uma visada sobre fake news a partir da autoridade jornalística. Revista FAMECOS, 25(3), 30572. DOI: 10.15448/1980-3729.2018.3.30572.
Schudson, M. (1978). Discovering the news: A social history of American newspapers. Basic Books.
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149-170. DOI: 10.1177/146488490100200201.
Schudson, M. (2011). The sociology of news. 2ª ed., 69-71. New York: Norton.
Shane, S. (2017). From headline to photograph, a fake news masterpiece. The New York Times, 18.
Sodré, M. & Paiva, R. (2011). Informação e boato na rede. In Silva, G: Künsch, D. & Berger, C. (eds.). Jornalismo contemporâneo: figurações, impasses e perspectivas. Salvador: EDUFBA; Brasília: Compós, 21-32.
Sousa, J. P. (2002). Teorias da notícia e do jornalismo. Chapecó: Argos.
Tandoc Jr, E.C., Jenkins, J. & Craft, S. (2019). Fake News as a Critical Incident in Journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(6), 673-689. DOI: 10.1080/17512786.2018.1562958
Tandoc Jr, E.C., Lim, Z.W. & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137-153. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143.
Tong, J. (2017). Journalistic Legitimacy Revisited: Collapse or revival in the digital age? Digital Journalism, 6(2), 256-273. DOI: 10.1080/21670811.2017.1360785
Traquina, N. (2004). Teorias do jornalismo: volume 1: porque as noticias são como são. Florianópolis: Insular.
Tuchman G. (1983) La producción de la noticia. Estudio sobre [a construcción de la realidad. Gustavo Gili, Barcelona.
Zelizer, B. (1990). Achieving journalistic authority through narrative. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 7(4), 366-376.
Zelizer, B. (1992). Covering the body: The Kennedy assassination, the media, and the shaping of collective memory. University of Chicago Press.
Zuckerman, E. (2017). Fake news is a red herring. Deutsche Well, 25. Enero. Recuperado de: http://www.dw.com/en/fake-news-is-a-red-herring/a-37269377.