La mediatización de la protesta social en el ecosistema mediático digital: una propuesta teórico-conceptual para su abordaje analítico

Juan David Cárdenas Ruiz

doi:10.26441/RC25.1-2026-4212

Authors

Juan David Cárdenas Ruiz Universidad de La Sabana (Colombia) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-1572

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26441/RC25.1-2026-4212

Keywords:

social protest, digital media coverage, digital opportunity, counter-publics, counter-framing

Abstract

Purpose: The mediatization of social protest has become a central axis for understanding contemporary transformations of collective action in contexts shaped by the digitalization of communication. Although protest has historically been an object of interest in political communication, classical approaches are insufficient to explain the dynamics emerging within the digital media ecosystem, particularly with regard to the reconfiguration of action repertoires, the struggle over symbolic power, and the production of meaning in the public sphere. In this context, the purpose of this article is to develop a theoretical–conceptual proposal for the analytical study of the digital mediatization of social protest. Methodology: The article adopts a qualitative, theoretical–conceptual approach based on a critical and interpretative analysis of academic literature on mediatization, social protest, and digital communication. Through a systematic review of the state of the art, the study identifies convergences, tensions, and analytical gaps in existing approaches, allowing for the articulation of different theoretical bodies into an integrative conceptual model. Results and conclusions: The findings suggest that digital mediatization does not merely amplify protest episodes, but rather substantially transforms the logic of collective action, public visibility, and symbolic struggle by reconfiguring traditional opportunity structures and modes of interaction among actors, media, and audiences. Original contribution: The main contribution of the article lies in the articulated formulation of the concepts of digital political–communicational opportunity structure, digital counter-frames of protest, and digital counter publics of protest. These concepts provide a novel and transferable analytical framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Juan David Cárdenas Ruiz, Universidad de La Sabana (Colombia)

Magister en Estudios Políticos y Relaciones Internacionales por la Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Politólogo, especialista en Opinión Pública y Marketing Político por la Universidad Javeriana. Profesor asociado, investigador y director del Observatorio de Medios de la Facultad de Comunicación de la Universidad de La Sabana. Sus líneas de investigación se orientan a los estudios de framing y análisis de procesos de comunicación política, especialmente en contextos electorales, gubernamentales y de movilización social. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4823-1572, juancar@unisabana.edu.co

References

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). (s. f.). ACLED conflict data. https://acleddata.com/conflict-data/download-data-files

Aiziczon, F. (2008). Cultura política de protesta: Una propuesta de aproximación conceptual. Cuadernos de Historia. Serie Economía y Sociedad, 10, 209–227.

Aruguete, N. (2017). Agenda setting y framing: Un debate teórico inconcluso. Más Poder Local, 30, 36–42.

Aruguete, N. (2022). Convergencias y divergencias en el entorno mediático-digital. Inmediaciones de la Comunicación, 17(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2022.17.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2022.17.2.3332

Baldi, V. (2017). Más allá de la sociedad algorítmica y automatizada: Para una reapropiación crítica de la cultura digital. Observatorio (OBS*), 11(3). https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS11320171053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS11320171093

Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611

Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2014). De los medios de comunicación de masas a las redes sociales. Revista de Pensamiento sobre Comunicación, Tecnología y Sociedad, 98, 58–72.

Block, E. (2013). A culturalist approach to the concept of the mediatization of politics: The age of “media hegemony.” Communication Theory, 23(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12016

Brants, K., & Voltmer, K. (2011). Introduction: Mediatization and decentralization of political communication. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Eds.), Political communication in postmodern democracy: Challenging the primacy of politics (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294799_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294783_1

Büll, J., & Fegert, J. (2025). Viral engagement? The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on e-participation. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-025-00300-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-025-00406-z

Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007

Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Mediation and protest movements. Intellect Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xw3km

Campus, D. (2010). Mediatization and personalization of politics in Italy and France: The cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209358762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161209358762

Cárdenas Ruiz, J. D. (2023). Las nuevas culturas políticas de construcción mediática de la protesta social en Colombia: Reflexiones sobre el paro nacional de 2021. FORUM. Revista Departamento de Ciencia Política, 24, 80–107. https://doi.org/10.15446/frdcp.n24.102345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/frdcp.n24.104187

Cárdenas Ruiz, J. D. (2025). Contraencuadres y contranarrativas de la protesta en Colombia en los medios nativos digitales durante el Paro Nacional de 2021. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, (158), 129–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i158.5099

Carty, V., & Reynoso Barron, F. G. (2019). Social movements and new technology: The dynamics of cyber activism in the digital age. In S. M. Buechler & K. J. Cybulski (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social movements, revolution, and social transformation (pp. 373–397). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92354-3_16

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001

Chadwick, A., Dennis, J., & Smith, A. P. (2015). Politics in the age of hybrid media: Power, systems, and media logics. In A. Bruns et al. (Eds.), The Routledge companion to social media and politics (pp. 7–22). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299-2

Chavero, P. (2018). Mediatización de la política en los nuevos gobiernos latinoamericanos: De la confrontación a la reconciliación. Revista Internacional de Comunicación y Desarrollo, 2(8), 119–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15304/ricd.2.8.5149

Costanza-Chock, S. (2003). Mapping the repertoire of electronic contention. Contributions to the Study of Mass Media and Communications, 66, 173–191.

Couldry, N. (2005). Media rituals: A critical approach. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986608

Couldry, N., & Curran, J. (2003). Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world. Rowman & Littlefield.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160

DataReportal (2024). Digital 2024: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-global-overview-report

DataReportal (2023). Digital 2023: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report

DataReportal (2022). Digital 2022: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-global-overview-report

DataReportal (2021). Digital 2021: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2021-global-overview-report

DataReportal (2020). Digital 2020: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-global-overview-report

DataReportal (2019). Digital 2019: Global overview report. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-global-overview-report

Della Porta, D. (2022). Contentious politics in emergency critical junctures: Progressive social movements during the pandemic. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009025638

Donsbach, W. (2011). Weimar 2.0. Acerca de la pérdida del espacio público. Diálogo Político, 2, 123–135. https://repositorio.uca.edu.ar/bitstream/123456789/7328/1/weimar-acerca-perdida-espacio-publico.pdf

Driessens, O., Raeymaeckers, K., Verstraeten, H., & Vandenbussche, S. (2010). Personalization according to politicians: A practice theoretical analysis of mediatization. Communications, 35(3), 309–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2010.017

Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a challenge: Media logic versus political logic. In H. Kriesi et al. (Eds.), Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization (pp. 155–176). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299871_7

Esser, F., & Strömbäck, J. (2014). Mediatization of politics: Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844

Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, (25/26), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/466240

Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183pdzs

Gerbaudo, P. (2017). Feeds from the square: Live streaming, live tweeting, and the self-representation of protest camps. In A. Brown et al. (Eds.), Protest camps in international context (pp. 91–108). Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781447329435.006

Gerbaudo, P. (2020). The pandemic crowd. Journal of International Affairs, 73(2), 61–76.

Haßler, J., Maurer, M., & Oschatz, C. (2014). Media logic and political logic online and offline: The case of climate change communication. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.889455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.889451

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155363

Hofstra, R., Michels, A., & Meijer, A. (2023). Online democratic participation during COVID-19: Assessing implications for inclusiveness of citizen engagement. Information Polity, 28(3), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211540

Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0021

Johnston, H., & Noakes, J. A. (2005). Frames of protest: Social movements and the framing perspective. Rowman & Littlefield.

Koopmans, R. (2004). Protest in time and space: The evolution of waves of contention. In D. A. Snow et al. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 19–46). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch2

Koopmans, R., & Olzak, S. (2004). Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American journal of Sociology, 110(1), 198-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/386271

Kowalewski, M. (2021). Street protests in times of COVID-19: Adjusting tactics and marching “as usual.” Social Movement Studies, 20(6), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1843014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1843014

Koziner, N. (2022). El frame-building: Una herramienta de análisis para el tratamiento mediático de las políticas de medios. Inmediaciones de la Comunicación, 17(2), 167–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18861/ic.2022.17.2.3313

Lundby, K. (2009). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequences. Peter Lang.

Lundby, K. (2014). Mediatization of communication (Vol. 21). De Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272215

McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2003). Dynamics of contention. Social Movement Studies, 2(1), 99-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2003.10035370

Mattoni, A. (2016). Repertoires of communication in social movement processes. In B. Cammaerts et al. (Eds.), Mediation and protest movements (pp. 41–56). Intellect Books.

Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198613

Milan, S. (2015). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135

Negrine, R. (2016). Demonstrations, protest, and communication: Changing media landscapes—changing media practices? In B. Brevini & J. Schlosberg (Eds.), Media, and revolt: Strategies and performances from the 1960s to the present (pp. 59–74). Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qd0bs.8

Ortiz, I., Burke, S., Berrada, M., & Saenz Cortés, H. (2022). World protests: A study of key protest issues in the 21st century. Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88513-7

Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001

Pariser, E. (2017). El filtro burbuja: Cómo la web decide lo que leemos y lo que pensamos. Taurus.

Pleyers, G. (2020). The pandemic is a battlefield: Social movements in the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Civil Society, 16(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2020.1794398

Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2018). Social media and new protest movements. In J. Burgess et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 546–561). SAGE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473984066.n31

Ponce, M. (2018). Medios y política: Análisis bibliográfico sobre el concepto de mediatización en el debate teórico de la comunicación política (1979–2017). Dixit, 29, 48–67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22235/d.v0i29.1697

Robles-Morales, J. M., & Córdoba-Hernández, A. M. (2019). Digital political participation, social networks, and big data: Disintermediation in the DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27757-4