Impact of Twitter communication on the environmental movement during COP15
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26441/RC23.1-2024-3383Keywords:
social media, Climate change, social movements, EnvironnementAbstract
The research analyzes the Twitter network made up of users and their interactions during the Conference of the Parties (COP) COP15 held in Montreal from December 7 to 19, 2022. The main objective is to measure the characteristics of the network and identify the key players in the conversation and the main topics addressed. We also sought to recognize if there was any relationship between the format of the messages and the level of engagement. To carry out the analysis, we used a methodology that combined quantitative and qualitative social network analysis techniques. The results suggest that communication through Twitter was a key factor in the successful mobilization of the environmental movement during COP15 and in raising awareness of the need to take concrete actions to address climate change. Likewise, the highest engagement was generated by mostly critical and urgent messages, focused on the need to take concrete action to address the biodiversity and climate change crisis. This reflects a separation between the activism reflected in the network and the scientific and political leadership present at the Summit.
Metrics
References
Ahrens, J. M. (2017, 2 de junio). Trump retira a EE UU del Acuerdo de París contra el cambio climático. El País. https://acortar.link/6xbcPS
Avaaz.org [@Avaaz]. (s.f.). Tuits [Twitter profile]. Twitter. Recuperado el 27 de febrero de 2023, https://twitter.com/Avaaz
Avaaz.org [@Avaaz]. (2022, 14 de diciembre). M. le Président @emmanuelmacron, avez vous lu @Le_Figaro et @libe ce matin dans votre avion pour assister au match #francemaroc? Dans la bataille pour sauver notre planète, nous sommes déjà entrés dans les prolongations. #COP15 https://bit.ly/3xYeQxi [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3ktIuYc
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2019). The road to Paris: Contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777
Barbosa dos Santos, M. L., Jaramillo Castro, O., & Aguirre Azócar, D. (2021). “Vital testimonio confirmó…”: Polarización de fuentes y redes en el Caso Catrillanca en Twitter. Cuadernos. info, (49), 26-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.49.27509
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 3(1), 361-362. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
Blue Heart Organization [@BlueEarthOrgan1]. (2022, 9 de diciembre). This #COP15 as women in Mombasa we are asking for: 1. More participation in conferences 2. Invest in grassroots that are working on restoration 3. Stop oppressive practices toward communities in the name of conservation 4. Fund our initiatives. #ClimateStrike #1MillionSpecies [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3SAlCmH
Boynton, G. R. (2010). COP15-Voice. Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment, Oxford Internet Institute.
Brand, E., & Gómez, H. (2006). Análisis de redes sociales como metodología de investigación. Elementos básicos y aplicación. La Sociología en sus Escenarios, (13), 1–28. https://hdl.handle.net/10495/2542
Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the'urban'politics of climate change. Environmental politics, 14(1), 42-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
Carrasco Polaino, R., Villar Cirujano, E., & Tejedor Fuentes, L. (2018). Twitter como herramienta de comunicación política en el contexto de referéndum independentista catalán: asociaciones ciudadanas frente a instituciones públicas. Icono 14, 16(1), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1134 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1134
Carrasco Polaino, R., Lafuente-Pérez, P., & Luna-García, Á. (2022). Twitter como canal para el activismo hacia el cambio climático durante la COP26. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 28(3), 511-523. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.80647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.80647
Chan, S., Hale, T., Deneault, A., Shrivastava, M., Mbeva, K., Chengo, V., & Atela, J. (2022). Assessing the effectiveness of orchestrated climate action from five years of summits. Nature Climate Change, 12(7), 628-633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01405-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01405-6
Chang, C., Armsworth, P., & Masuda, Y. (2022). Environmental Discourse Exhibits Consistency and Variation across Spatial Scales on Twitter. Bioscience, 72, 789 - 797. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biac051
Cherven, K. (2015). Mastering Gephi network visualization. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Clauset, A., Newman, M. E., & Moore, C. (2004). Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical review E, 70(6), 066111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
Colina, M., Colina, K., Fernández, A., Maia, M., & Torrealba, D. (2021). Un recorrido electoral en Twitter Venezuela durante el periodo enero de 2019 a diciembre de 2020. Espacios, 42(12), 94-114. https://dx.doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a21v42n12p08 DOI: https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a21v42n12p08
Coppock, A., Guess, A., & Ternovski, J. (2016). When Treatments are Tweets: A Network Mobilization Experiment over Twitter. Political Behavior, 38, 105-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11109-015-9308-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9308-6
Dahal, B., Kumar, S. A., & Li, Z. (2019). Topic modeling and sentiment analysis of global climate change tweets. Social network analysis and mining, 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-019-0568-8
Diffusion France payée: Libération, Le Monde et Le Parisien en forme en août. (2022, 6 de octubre). 100%Media, de https://bit.ly/3IVaxJC
Dikmen, A. (2020). Global Climate Governance between State and Non-State Actors: Dynamics of Contestation and Re-Legitimation. Marmara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(Özel Sayı), 59-79. https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.763831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14782/marmarasbd.763831
Eurobarómetro. (2021). EU citizens’ knowledge and attitudes towards Science and Technology. Special barometrer 516 [Conjunto de datos] https://bit.ly/3Z8iz7y
Frenkel, S. (2022, 11 de julio). Todo lo que debes saber sobre los bots de Twitter, y su relación con la compra de Elon Musk. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3Rt0JHE
Fundación BBVA. (2008). Percepciones y actitudes de los españoles hacia el calentamiento global. https://bit.ly/3JtGRR0
Gálvez, C. (2018). El campo de investigación del Análisis de Redes Sociales en el área de las Ciencias de la Documentación: un análisis de co-citación y co-palabras. Revista general de información y documentación, 28(2), 455. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/RGID.62834 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.62834
Garza, C. H. (2021). Narrativas en red: dominación o agencia en discursos de Twitter y YouTube frente al fenómeno del feminicidio en México. Virtualis, 12(23), 95-122. https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46530/virtualis.v12i23.389
Giuffredi-Kähr, A., Petrova, A., & Malär, L. (2022). Sponsorship Disclosure of Influencers – A Curse or a Blessing? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 57(1), 18-34. https://bit.ly/3SC92TY DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10949968221075686
Gomez Carrasco, P., & Michelon, G. (2017). The Power of Stakeholders' Voice: The Effects of Social Media Activism on Stock Markets. Business Strategy and The Environment, 26, 855-872. https://doi.org/10.1002/BSE.1973 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1973
Gong ZH, Lyford C. Using Social Media for More Engaged Users and Enhanced Health Communication in Diabetes Care. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 2022, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211064832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15598276211064832
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A. et al. The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network. Scientific Reports 1, 197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197
Grandjean, M. (2015). Gephi: Introduction to network analysis and visualization. Disponible en: https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_0F0EB41780EB.P001/REF.pdf
Guidry, J., Waters, R., & Saxton, G. (2014). Moving Social Marketing Beyond Personal Change to Social Change: Strategically Using Twitter to Mobilize Supporters into Vocal Advocates. Journal of Social Marketing, 4, 240-260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2014-0014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-02-2014-0014
Hagen, B. (2015). Public Perception of Climate Change. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758558
Hanneman, R. A. (2000). Introducción a los métodos del análisis de redes sociales. Redes.
Hansen, Derek; Shneiderman, Ben; Smit & Marc A. (2010). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00011-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-382229-1.00011-4
Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of environmental policy & planning, 7(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
Hodges, H., & Stocking, G. (2016). A pipeline of tweets: environmental movements’ use of Twitter in response to the Keystone XL pipeline. Environmental Politics, 25, 223 - 247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105177 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1105177
Horstink, L. (2017). Online participation and the new global democracy: Avaaz, a case study. Global Society, 31(1), 101-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2016.1235552
Hutchins, B. (2016). The Many Modalities of Social Networking: The Role of Twitter in Greens Politics. Environmental Communication, 10, 25 - 42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.966853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.966853
Hutchinson, J. (2021). Blocked by YouTube? Unseen digital intermediaries for social imaginaries in the Asia Pacific. Media International Australia, 181(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211017917 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211017917
Ivanova, M. (2016). Good COP, Bad COP: Climate Reality after Paris. Global Policy, 7, 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12370
Jacomy M, Venturini T, Heymann S, Bastian M (2014) ForceAtlas2, a Continuous Graph Layout Algorithm for Handy Network Visualization Designed for the Gephi Software. PLoS ONE 9(6): e98679. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098679
Jang, S. M., & Hart, P. S. (2015). Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global environmental change, 32, 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.010
Junsheng, H., Akhtar, R., Masud, M. M., Rana, M. S., & Banna, H. (2019). The role of mass media in communicating climate science: An empirical evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117934
Khokhar, D. (2015). Gephi cookbook. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Kirilenko, A. P., & Stepchenkova, S. O. (2014). Public microblogging on climate change: One year of Twitter worldwide. Global environmental change, 26, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.008
Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2015). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New media & society, 17(8), 1241-1257. https://10.1177/1461444814522952nms.sagepub.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
Lancia, F. (2010) Word co-occurrence similarity in meaning. In S. Salvatore & J. Valsiner ( E d s.) Mind as infinite dimensionality. Roma: Firera Publishing Group.
Lavender, J. (2017). El cambio de código en los hashtags: Expansión de audiencia y afiliación en una comunidad multilingüe. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 10(2), 297-318. https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/shll-2017-0009
Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., Feinberg, G., & Howe, P. (2013). Climate change in the American mind: Americans' global warming beliefs and attitudes in April 2013. Yale University and George Mason University New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2298705
Leong, C., Pan, S., Bahri, S., & Fauzi, A. (2018). Social media empowerment in social movements: power activation and power accrual in digital activism. European Journal of Information Systems, 28, 173 - 204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2018.1512944
López-Navarrete, A. J., Cabrera-Méndez, M., Díez-Somavilla, R., & Calduch-Losa, Á. (2021). Fórmula para medir el engagement del espectador en YouTube: investigación exploratoria sobre los principales youtubers españoles. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 12(1), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM000013
Lövbrand, E., Hjerpe, M., & Linnér, B. O. (2017). Making climate governance global: how UN climate summitry comes to matter in a complex climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 580-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1319019
Lozares Colina, C. (1996). La teoría de redes sociales. Papers: revista de sociología, (48), 103-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v48n0.1814
Macron, E. [@EmmanuelMacron]. (2022, 17 de diciembre). À quelques jours de la fin de la COP 15 biodiversité de Montréal, le message que j'adresse à nos partenaires est le suivant : ne prenons pas de petites décisions, faisons le maximum ! Portons ensemble l'accord le plus ambitieux qui soit. Le monde en a besoin. [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3Sw3I4q
Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C., & Mertz, C. K. (2011). Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PloS one, 6(3), e17571. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017571
Marini, C. y D’Andrea, A. (2015): T-Lab plus version. Roccasecca (Italia).
Mendez Santos, María del Carmen (2020). La construcción de la identidad lingüística de Santiago Abascal en Twitter. Revista Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD), (3), 52-79 https://doi.org/10.24197/redd.3.2020.50-77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24197/redd.3.2020.50-77
Molina, J. L. (2004). La ciencia de las redes. Apuntes de Ciencia y Tecnología, 11(1), 36-42.
Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sainz, A., & Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2018). Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.079
Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Climate Change, 1(1), 31-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.11
National Science Board (2018). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding (Science and Engineering Indicators). Arlington, VA https://bit.ly/2oFdl3g
Nisbet, E. C., Cooper, K. E., & Garrett, R. K. (2015). The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 36-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214555474
Padilla, G., & Rodríguez, J. (2022a). International Youth Movements for Climate Change: The# FridaysForFuture Case on Twitter. Sustainability, 15(1), 268. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010268
Padilla, G., & Rodríguez, J. (2022b). Sostenibilidad en TikTok tras la COVID-19. Los influencers virales en español y sus micro-acciones. Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, (28), 573-585. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/esmp.81133 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.81133
Pan, S. L., Chou, J., Morrison, A. M., Huang, W. S., & Lin, M. C. (2018). Will the future be greener? The environmental behavioral intentions of university tourism students. Sustainability, 10(3), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030634
Patterson, S., & Mann, M. (2022, 14 noviembre). Public Disapproval of Disruptive Climate Change Protests. Penn Center for Science, Sustainability, and the Media. https://bit.ly/3m9CfJI
Phadke, R. (2015). Behind the Walls: Manifestations of Place and Space at COP21. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 1, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2015.008
Plumer, B., & Popovich, N. (2021, 29 octubre). Calentamiento global: las medidas actuales no bastan. The New York Times. https://nyti.ms/3SvFA1L
Polaino, R. C., Cirujano, E. V., & Cárdaba, M. Á. M. (2021). El pulso pro-vacunas vs antivacunas en Twitter: redes, actores y" engagement". In Oportunidades para la participación y la democratización de las organizaciones en el siglo XXI (pp. 309-322). Dykinson. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12766/359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2gz3tt5.19
Reuters Institute. (2022). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2022. https://bit.ly/3Z4mN05
Rivas-de-Roca, R. (2020). La configuración del fenómeno ecologista #FridaysForFuture como proceso de opinión pública digital en España. Dígitos. Revista de Comunicación Digital, 6, 79-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/rd.v1i6.162
Rodríguez, J. A. (1995): Análisis estructural y de redes. Cuadernos Metodológicos, 16. Madrid, CIS
Roxburgh, N., Guan, D., Shin, K. J., Rand, W., Managi, S., Lovelace, R., & Meng, J. (2019). Characterising climate change discourse on social media during extreme weather events. Global environmental change, 54, 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.11.004
Sanz, L. (2003). Análisis de redes sociales: o cómo representar las estructuras sociales subyacentes. Apuntes de ciencia y tecnología, 7, 21-29 https://bit.ly/3SzZbOm
Scaramuzzino, G., & Scaramuzzino, R. (2017). The weapon of a new generation?—Swedish Civil Society Organizations’ use of social media to influence politics. Journal of information technology & politics, 14(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1276501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1276501
Seo, S. (2017). Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate change policy negotiations and future directions. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 9, 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/RSP3.12090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090
Sharma, S. K., & Hoque, X. (2017). Sentiment predictions using support vector machines for odd-even formula in Delhi. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 9(7), 61-69. http://10.5815/ijisa.2017.07.07 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2017.07.07
SocialInsider (2022). 2022 Social Media Industry Benchmarks - Know Exactly Where You Stand in Your Market. https://bit.ly/3E1UUxW
Sousa, S., Correia, E., Leite, J., & Viseu, C. (2021). Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior of higher education students: a case study in Portugal. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(4), 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1838122
Sued, G. E., Castillo-González, M. C., Pedraza, C., Flores-Márquez, D., Álamo, S., Ortiz, M., ... & Arroyo, R. E. (2022). Vernacular visibility and algorithmic resistance in the public expression of Latin American feminism. Media International Australia, 183(1), 60-76. https://10.1177/1329878X211067571journals.sagepub.com/home/mia DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211067571
Theocharis, Y., Vitoratou, S., & Sajuria, J. (2017). Civil Society in Times of Crisis: Understanding Collective Action Dynamics in Digitally-Enabled Volunteer Networks. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun., 22, 248-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12194
Torrijos, J. L. R., & Vegas, X. R. (2017). Accountability en las redes sociales. Libros de estilo en continua evolución y retroalimentación a través de Twitter. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (72), 915-941. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2017-1200
Tornos Inza, E. (2020). Tasa de interacción (engagement) en Twitter. Related: Marketing. https://bit.ly/3T5lXhf
Trudeau, J. [@JustinTrudeau]. (2022, 19 de diciembre). Historic. That’s what negotiators, leaders, and activists are calling the deal the world has reached in Montreal on protecting nature. Canada stepped up as host location for these #COP15 negotiations – and drove an ambitious deal – because we knew how much this mattered. [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/3mcSUMg
Ure, M. (2018). Engagement estratégico y encuentro conversacional en los medios sociales. Revista de comunicación, 17(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.26441/RC17.1-2018-A10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26441/RC17.1-2018-A10
Valenzuela, S. (2013). Unpacking the Use of Social Media for Protest Behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 920 - 942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375
Victor, D. (1995). On writing good histories of climate change and testing social science theories. Climatic Change, 29, 363-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01092423
Von der Leyen, U. [@vonderleyen]. (2022, 19 de diciembre). I welcome the historic outcome of #COP15. The world has agreed on unprecedented and measurable nature protection and restoration goals and on a Global Biodiversity Fund. And investing into nature also means fighting climate change. The EU will stay the course. #NextGenerationEU [Tuit]. Twitter. https://bit.ly/41vjn7X
Vu, H. T., Blomberg, M., Seo, H., Liu, Y., Shayesteh, F., & Do, H. V. (2021). Social media and environmental activism: Framing climate change on Facebook by global NGOs. Science communication, 43(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470209716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020971644
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Young consumers' intention towards buying green products in a developing nation: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, (135), 732-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.120
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2013). Análisis de redes sociales. Métodos y aplicaciones (Vol. 10). CIS-Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
Zárate, P. (2022, 15 diciembre). El Francia-Marruecos (45.1 %) arrasa con récord y facilita el buen debut de «Fuerza de paz» (10.8 %) entre las series de La 1. Vertele. https://bit.ly/3koWnqQ
Zou, Y., Fu, Y., Yang, L., Wan, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2017). China and COP 15: a path for responsible environmental power. Biodiversity Science, 25, 1169-1175. https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2017246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17520/biods.2017246
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de Comunicación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Portal de Revistas de la Universidad de Piura.