Scrolling with (dis)comfort on AI-generated news: exploring group differences and the role of social media use in Portugal

Paulo Couraceiro; Miguel  Paisana; António  Vasconcelos

doi:10.26441/RC24.2-2025-4049

Autores/as

Paulo Couraceiro University of Minho (Portugal) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-2081
Miguel Paisana Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon (Portugal) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-8092
António Vasconcelos Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon (Portugal) https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9935-0953

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26441/RC24.2-2025-4049

Palabras clave:

Inteligencia Artificial, IA Generativa, Estudios de Audiencia, Redes Sociales, Alfabetización algorítmica, Aceptación de la IA, Consumo de Noticias, Periodismo

Resumen

Propósito. El creciente papel de la IA en la producción de noticias plantea cuestiones sobre la aceptación de la audiencia. Se exploran diferencias en los niveles de comodidad con noticias generadas por IA y asistidas por IA, considerando el efecto de las fuentes principales de noticias. Se plantea que el uso de redes sociales como principal acceso a las noticias puede influir en la comodidad con la IA debido a la familiaridad con la personalización algorítmica. Metodología. Se realizó un análisis cuantitativo con 2012 internautas portugueses. Se aplicaron pruebas no paramétricas para comparaciones de grupo y se creó un índice compuesto de comodidad con la IA para evaluar interacciones entre conocimiento de IA y fuente principal de noticias. Resultados y conclusiones. Se observa mayor comodidad cuando la IA actúa como asistente en vez de generadora de noticias. Existen diferencias significativas entre grupos según factores demográficos y confianza. Se identifican efectos en la comparación entre distintos niveles de conocimiento de IA y entre usuarios de redes sociales y de noticias tradicionales. Aunque no estadísticamente significativo, el efecto de interacción muestra que los usuarios con mayor conocimiento de IA que confían en redes sociales como su principal fuente de noticias presentan un aumento en la comodidad con las noticias generadas por IA. Contribución. Estos resultados resaltan la relevancia de la fuente principal de noticias en la aceptación de la IA en el periodismo, especialmente ante un entorno mediático cambiante, donde tecnologías como chatbots podrían desempeñar un papel clave en la distribución de noticias.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Biografía del autor/a

Paulo Couraceiro, University of Minho (Portugal)

Researcher at Communication and Society Research Centre (CECS) of the University of Minho and at OberCom – Observatory of Communication. Currently a PhD candidate in Communication Sciences at the University of Minho. Member of IBERIFIER – Iberian Digital Media Observatory, and young scholars’ representative and communication officer in the Audience and Reception Studies section of ECREA. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-2081, paulo.couraceiro@obercom.pt

Miguel Paisana, Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon (Portugal)

PhD in Communication Sciences, lecturer at Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon. Researcher at CIES-Iscte and OberCom – Observatory of Communication. Member of IBERIFIER – Iberian Digital Media Observatory and author of the Digital News Report Portugal. Main research topics of interest are the evolution of the media ecosystem, journalism and the changes associated to media formats, namely audio and podcasting. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6316-8092, miguel_paisana@iscte-iul.pt

António Vasconcelos, Iscte – University Institute of Lisbon (Portugal)

PhD Fellow in Communication Sciences at Iscte-IUL. Researcher at CIES-Iscte and OberCom – Observatory of Communication, previously involved in the projects EUMEPLAT – European Media Platforms: Assessing Positive and Negative Externalities for European Culture, and WellApp, in collaboration with ICNOVA. Currently, he is part of the Portuguese team of IBERIFIER – Iberian Digital Media Observatory. https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9935-0953, antonio_barros_vasconcelos@iscte-iul.pt

Citas

Aggarwal, M. S., Singhal, G., & Malhotra, M. S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Social Media: Current Perceptions and Future Outlook. Journalism and Media, 3(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010002

Araujo, T., Helberger, N., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence. AI & Society, 35, 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00931-w

Arguedas, A. R. (2024). Public attitudes towards the use of AI in journalism. In N. Newman, R. Fletcher, C. T. Robertson, A. R. Arguedas, & R. K. Nielsen, Digital news report 2024 (pp. 39–43). Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-vy6n-4v57

Baldassarre, M. T., Caivano, D., Fernandez Nieto, B., Gigante, D., & Ragone, A. (2023, September). The social impact of generative ai: An analysis on chatgpt. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (pp. 363-373). https://doi.org/10.1145/3582515.3609555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3582515.3609555

Barrolleta, A., & Sandoval-Martín, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence versus journalists: The quality of automated news and bias by authorship using a Turing test. Anàlisi: Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, 70, 15-36. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3681

BBC & Ipsos. (2024). Embedding the audience: Putting audiences at the heart of Generative AI. BBC & Ipsos.

Beckett, C. & Yaseen, M. (2023). Generating Change: A global survey of what news organisations are doing with AI. The London School of Economics and Political Science.

Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S. (2022). Why’s everyone on TikTok now? The algorithmized self and the future of self-making on social media. Social media+ society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086241

Bonini, T., & Treré, E. (2024). Algorithms of resistance: The everyday fight against platform power. Mit Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14329.001.0001

Borg, J. S., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Conitzer, V. (2024). Moral AI: And how we get there. Random House.

Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? John Wiley & Sons.

Buyl, P., Graefe, A., & Trilling, D. (2024). Buyl, M., Rogiers, A., Noels, S., Dominguez-Catena, I., Heiter, E., Romero, R., … De Bie, T. (2024). Large language models reflect the ideology of their creators. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.18417

Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2022). Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(9), 1727–1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543

Cardoso, G., Paisana, M., & Pinto-Martinho, A. (2024). Digital News Report Portugal 2024. OberCom - Observatório da Comunicação.

Carifio. J.. & Perla. R. (2008). Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Medical Education. 42(12). 1150–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03172.x

Carlson, M. (2015). The Robotic Reporter: Automated journalism and the redefinition of labor, compositional forms, and journalistic authority. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 416–431. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976412

Couraceiro, P., & Paisana, M. (2024). From Algorithmic Personalization to Journalistic Mediation: Changes in the Preferences of Young Portuguese in Online News Consumption. Media & Jornalismo, 24(45), e4504. https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_45_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_45_4

Coddington, M. (2014). Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn: A typology for evaluating data journalism, computational journalism, and computer-assisted reporting. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976400 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976400

Clerwall, C. (2014). Enter the Robot Journalist: Users’ perceptions of automated content. Journalism Practice, 8(5), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.883116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2014.883116

Cui, D., & Wu, F. (2021). The influence of media use on public perceptions of artificial intelligence in China: evidence from an online survey. Information Development, 37(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919893411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919893411

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

DeCoster. J.. Iselin. A.-M. R.. & Gallucci. M. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods. 14(4). 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016956 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016956

de-Lima-Santos, M.-F., & Ceron, W. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in News Media: Current Perceptions and Future Outlook. Journalism and Media, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3010002

Diakopoulos, N. (2019). Automating the News: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Media. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674239302

Dörr, K. N. (2016). Mapping the field of Algorithmic Journalism. Digital Journalism, 4(6), 700–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2015.1096748

Fast, E., & Horvitz, E. (2017). Long-Term Trends in the Public Perception of Artificial Intelligence. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10635

Fitzsimons. G. J. (2008). Death to Dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research. 35(1). 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1086/589561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/589561

Gerlich, M. (2023). Perceptions and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence: A Multi-Dimensional Study. Social Sciences, 12(9), 502. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12090502

Gondwe, G. (2025). Perceptions of AI-driven news among contemporary audiences: A study of trust, engagement, and impact. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02294-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02294-x

Graefe, A., & Bohlken, N. (2020). Automated Journalism: A Meta-Analysis of Readers’ Perceptions of Human-Written in Comparison to Automated News. Media and Communication, 8(3), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3019

Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., & Brosius, H.-B. (2016). Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: Credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism, 19(5), 595-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269

Haque, M. U., Dharmadasa, I., Sworna, Z. T., Rajapakse, R. N., & Ahmad, H. (2022). " I think this is the most disruptive technology": Exploring Sentiments of ChatGPT Early Adopters using Twitter Data. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.05856

Heiselberg, L., Blom, J., & Dalen, A. V. (2022). Automated News Reading in the Neural Age: Audience Reception and Perceived Credibility of a News Broadcast Read By a Neural Voice. Journalism Studies, 23(8), 896-914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2052346 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2022.2052346

Henestrosa, A. L., Greving, H., & Kimmerle, J. (2023). Automated journalism: The effects of AI authorship and evaluative information on the perception of a science journalism article. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107445 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107445

Ibrahim, M., Hossain, A., & Rahman, S. (2025). The technology acceptance model and adopter type analysis in the context of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1496518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1496518

Iacobucci. D.. Posavac. S. S.. Kardes. F. R.. Schneider. M. J.. & Popovich. D. L. (2015). The median split: Robust. refined. and revived. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 25(4). 690–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.014

Jacome, I. J. M., Bossio, J. I. D. la H., Guiliany, J. G., & Pérez, Y. R. (2021). The Metrics of the Audience: The New Journalistic Gut. Estudos Em Comunicação, 33. https://ojs.labcom-ifp.ubi.pt/ec/article/view/846

Jang, W. (Eric), Kwak, D. H., & Bucy, E. (2022). Knowledge of automated journalism moderates evaluations of algorithmically generated news. New Media & Society, 26(10), 5898-5922. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221142534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221142534

Jia, C., & Johnson, T. (2021). Source Credibility Matters: Does Automated Journalism Inspire Selective Exposure?. International Journal Of Communication, 15, 22. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16546

Jönsson, J. (2021). AI acceptance and attitudes: People’s perception of healthcare and commercial AI applications (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-176507

Jung, J., Song, H., Kim, Y., Im, H., & Oh, S. (2017). Intrusion of software robots into journalism: The public's and journalists' perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists. Computers in human behavior, 71, 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.022

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Quality & quantity, 47(4), 2025-2047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9

Lambert, S.I., Madi, M., Sopka, S. et al. (2023). An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals. npj Digital Medicine, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00852-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00852-5

Latar, N. L. (2018). Robot Journalism: Can Human Journalism Survive? World Scientific. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/10913

Leiter, C., Zhang, R., Chen, Y., Belouadi, J., Larionov, D., Fresen, V., & Eger, S. (2024). Chatgpt: A meta-analysis after 2.5 months. Machine Learning with Applications, 16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100541 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2024.100541

Lermann Henestrosa, A., & Kimmerle, J. (2024). The Effects of Assumed AI vs. Human Authorship on the Perception of a GPT-Generated Text. Journalism and Media, 5(3), 1085-1097. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5030069

Lewis, S. C., & Westlund, O. (2014). Big Data and Journalism: Epistemology, expertise, economics, and ethics. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976418

Li, W., & Zheng, X. (2024). Social media use and attitudes toward AI: The mediating roles of perceived AI fairness and threat. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2024(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3448083 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3448083

Logg, J. M., Minson, J. A., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 151, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.12.005

Longoni, C., Fradkin, A., Cian, L., & Pennycock, G. (2022). News from Generative Artificial Intelligence Is Believed Less. FAccT '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533077

Mahony, S., & Chen, Q. (2024). Concerns about the role of artificial intelligence in journalism, and media manipulation. Journalism, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241263293 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849241263293

Merten, L. (2020). Block, Hide or Follow—Personal News Curation Practices on Social Media. Digital Journalism, 9(8), 1018–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1829978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1829978

Miyazaki, K., Murayama, T., Uchiba, T., An, J., & Kwak, H. (2024). Public perception of generative AI on Twitter: an empirical study based on occupation and usage. EPJ Data Science, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00445-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00445-y

Mohamed, E. A. S., Osman, M. E. & Mohamed, B. A. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Social Media Content. Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2024.12.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2024.12.16

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Ross Arguedas, A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2024). Reuters Institute digital news report 2024. Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-vy6n-4v57

Nitin, R., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence: key factors, challenges, and implementation strategies. SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4842167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4842167

Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001

Norman. G. (2010). Likert scales. levels of measurement and the ‘laws’ of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice. 15(5). 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology Readiness Index (Tri): A Multiple-Item Scale to Measure Readiness to Embrace New Technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024001

Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061

Pavlik, J. (2000). The Impact of Technology on Journalism. Journalism Studies, 1(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700050028226 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700050028226

Porlezza, C. (2024). The datafication of digital journalism: A history of everlasting challenges between ethical issues and regulation. Journalism, 25(5), 1167-1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231190232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231190232

Qi, W., Pan, J., Lyu, H., & Luo, J. (2024). Excitements and concerns in the post-chatgpt era: Deciphering public perception of ai through social media analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102158

Sadiku, M. N., Ashaolu, T. J., Ajayi-Majebi, A., & Musa, S. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence in social media. International Journal of Scientific Advances, 2(1), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i1.4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v2i1.4

Sánchez-García, P., Diez-Gracia, A., Mayorga, I. R., & Jerónimo, P. (2025). Media Self-Regulation in the Use of AI: Limitation of Multimodal Generative Content and Ethical Commitments to Transparency and Verification. Journalism and Media, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6010029

Saurwein, F., & Spencer-Smith, C. (2021). Automated trouble: The role of algorithmic selection in harms on social media platforms. Media and Communication, 9(4), 222-233. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-232380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i4.4062

Shin, D. (2020). User Perceptions of Algorithmic Decisions in the Personalized AI System:Perceptual Evaluation of Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Explainability. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(4), 541–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1843357

Shin, D. (2022). How do people judge the credibility of algorithmic sources? AI & Society, 37, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01158-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01158-4

Shin, D., Zhong, B., & Biocca, F.A. (2020). Beyond user experience: What constitutes algorithmic experiences? International Journal of Information Management, 52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.102061

Silverstone, R., & Hirsch, E. (Eds.). (1992). Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces. Routledge.

Sohn, K., & Kwon, O. (2020). Technology acceptance theories and factors influencing artificial intelligence-based intelligent products. Telematics and Informatics, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101324

Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business information review, 34(3), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446

Swart, J. (2021). Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Social media+ society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008828

Taherdoost, H. (2023). Machine learning algorithms: features and applications. In Encyclopedia of Data Science and Machine Learning (pp. 938-960). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9220-5.ch054

Tandoc Jr., E. C., Yao, L. J., & Wu, S. (2020). Man vs. Machine? The Impact of Algorithm Authorship on News Credibility. Digital Journalism, 8(4), 548–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1762102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1762102

Tucker, T. (2011). What influences young adults’ decision to adopt new technology?. The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 2(2), 147-157.

Túñez-López, J. M., Toural-Bran, C., & Frazão-Nogueira, A. G. (2020). From Data Journalism to Robotic Journalism: The Automation of News Processing. Studies in Big Data, 70, 17–28. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36315-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36315-4_2

Vogels, E.A. (9th September 2019). Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life. Pew Research Center. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/09/09/us-generations-technology-use/

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

Wang, S. (2023). Factors related to user perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI)-based content moderation on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107971 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107971

Wölker, A., & Powell, T. E. (2018). Algorithms in the newsroom? News readers’ perceived credibility and selection of automated journalism. Journalism, 22(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884918757072

Wu, S., Tandoc, E. C., Jr., & Salmon, C. T. (2019). Journalism Reconfigured: Assessing human–machine relations and the autonomous power of automation in news production. Journalism Studies, 20(10), 1440–1457. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1521299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1521299

Yi, M., & Choi, H. (2024). What drives the acceptance of AI technology? The role of expectations and experiences. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.13670

Zhang, C., Schießl, J., Plößl, L. et al. (2023). Acceptance of artificial intelligence among pre-service teachers: a multigroup analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(49). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00420-7